10/19/2021 0 Comments Check Mac For Software Updates
Moreover, with this addition MWB moves toward becoming bloatware. MWB should remain focused on its core mission of malware detection, prevention and removal.Adding an update checker creates unnecessary complexity, added cost, and slows development. Now, return to the Settings section, and tap.I strongly oppose integrating a software update checker into MWB. You can find the status of the update at the bottom of the screen. That way, users can still benefit from important security updates, while the admin works to approve the latest major release for production in their environment.That said, PSI was a good tool and I do miss it and I would like to see a viable alternative, I just don't believe it is something that Malwarebytes would ever attempt, however I will provide your feedback to the Product team and it is always possible that they might consider making it happen.Locate and tap the Software Update option. In macOS 11.3 or later, an admin may now choose to delay major releases for longer than minor releases.Recently, one application update resulted in a registry corruption that caused the software to not open luckily the developer quickly issued a hotfix update. Sometimes new updates create more problems than they solve. Some application have unique requirements as part of their update process. No big deal it's become a habit.I use SUMo only to alert me to possible updates I don't need or want any update checker to take over the process of actually updating the software.Even the best checking software makes mistakes. Daily, at Windows startup I click on SUMo to check for new application updates. I use Software Update Monitor.
Check For Software S Drivers And DLLsThey also recently added an enhanced heuristics component based on Machine Learning and cloud functionality that can also be enabled/disabled independent of the other components and of course it uses its own databases as well. I can't speculate as to cost, at least for the end user as that would be something for their Executive team and Marketing folks to determine, however if Malwarebytes ever did pursue something like this they would do it the right way by hiring new people to work on it independently of the current Malwarebytes components and they would use the same modular architecture which they have used to integrate all of their other tools/components into Malwarebytes which so far include Web Protection (didn't originally exist in Malwarebytes at the beginning it's a separate driver/module with its own databases, exclusions and APIs), Anti-Rootkit (a separate engine/driver, again with its own databases and components integrated in such a way that it can be easily enabled/disabled with a single setting for scans), Anti-Exploit which uses its own modules, drivers and DLLs to monitor the system and processes for exploit behavior, completely independent of the primary scan engine and Malware Protection component, and the newest addition, Ransomware Protection which likewise is behavior based, uses its own driver and modules and works independently of all the others. This still requires human judgment not artificial intelligence.Adding an update checker creates unnecessary complexity, added cost, and slows development.Not to argue that I think Malwarebytes should pursue this as I don't personally believe they should, nor do I believe they would, however it would definitely not slow development or increase complexity. In a few other cases the update was not appropriate for my version of Windows.Moral = It's best to check out each update on the developer's website to determine how it might affect my installation before applying the update. X update resulting in problems for older installations and clamor for clarification from existing users.There are also a few other alternatives, but I haven't tested any of them to any great degree so I don't know how good any of them are. So, I took your reply as a way to clarify the MWB modular development process and to reassure members about any future additional enhancements to MWB.Thanks again for the detailed explanation.I'm not certain if they will add this feature or not, but it has been suggested in the past and I have noticed that some AVs have this kind of feature now, especially since Secunia stopped offering their free Personal SOftware Inspector (PSI) tool a while back. Good that you mention it here for those members who were unaware of your previous role with MWB.I noted your personal opinion that software updating should not be part of MWB. At least some of the cost would be for Malwarebytes acquiring experienced personnel another cost would be in maintaining an accurate and up-to-date listing of available updates.I was aware of your previous role in MWB development and defer to your expertise. Another choice is how do you streamline keeping track of new updates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWilliam ArchivesCategories |